This study is intended to support multi-cloud planning and as a result, it has consistently taken a conservative approach to the price-performance factors. The comparisons show that for cloud-scale advanced analytics workloads, AWS comes with higher TCO, lower workload throughput and higher overall price-performance (lower is better) than HPE on-prem. In this blog series so far, we compared TCO, pure performance and price-performance. In fact, we leveraged these very benefits for deployment of the AWS test environment to accomplish this study. The rise of the public cloud significantly disrupted the traditional IT model by offering these new capabilities of pay-per-use: no upfront payments, speed of deployment, the ability to shift capital expenses to operational expenses, the promise of better utilization rates, and the ability to dismantle a setup and walk away from it without penalty. You can download the complete technical white paper here: HPE On-Prem vs. We introduce price-performance with agility as a key topic that must be considered in any Hybrid Cloud strategy. Part 5: To wrap up our five-part blog series, we focus on pay-per-use consumption models and the evolving dynamics driving to Hybrid IT. HPE Blog, Austria, Germany & Switzerland.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |